22. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State
Unfortunately this one doesn't have a photo... so sad, I know.
Here's the description: Between 1965 and 1990, federal judges in almost all of the states handed down sweeping rulings affecting virtually every prison and jail in the United States. Without a doubt judges were the most important prison reformers during this period. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin provide an account of this process, and use it to explore the more general issue of the role of courts in the modern bureaucratic state. In doing so, they provide detailed accounts of how the courts formulated and sought to implement their orders, and how this action affected the traditional conceptions of federalism, separation of powers, and the rule of law.
The underlying message was interesting, but the authors really just wanted to see how smart they could make themselves look with big words and had a tendency to repeat the same points over and over and over again. Blech!
Here's the description: Between 1965 and 1990, federal judges in almost all of the states handed down sweeping rulings affecting virtually every prison and jail in the United States. Without a doubt judges were the most important prison reformers during this period. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin provide an account of this process, and use it to explore the more general issue of the role of courts in the modern bureaucratic state. In doing so, they provide detailed accounts of how the courts formulated and sought to implement their orders, and how this action affected the traditional conceptions of federalism, separation of powers, and the rule of law.
The underlying message was interesting, but the authors really just wanted to see how smart they could make themselves look with big words and had a tendency to repeat the same points over and over and over again. Blech!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home